Context Maintenance Challenges in AI Collaborative Development
When I started Vibe Coding, the biggest issue I discovered was the harsh constraint that AI resets its memory with each task. This becomes a significant barrier when collaborating with humans.
In typical system development, engineers work on the same project over long periods, remembering context and past decisions. But AI is different. I quickly realized that AI is like a highly competent new hire who joins and leaves on the same day. AI tasks are typically completed in short timeframes, and with each reset, we're essentially experiencing repeated meetings and partings. In my experience, most tasks were completed in tens of minutes, so it felt like constantly starting work with a new collaborator.
To address this problem, my first attempt was quite primitive. While the AI was implementing, my hands were free, so I continuously took manual notes. I kept records all day alongside the AI.
This reduced misunderstandings across tasks, but ironically, I found myself in a situation where I wasn't sure "am I delegating work to AI, or is AI delegating work to me?" During what should have been time saved by the AI, I, the human, was trapped in the monotonous task of note-taking – completely defeating the purpose.
The solution I discovered in another developer's blog was the concept called Memory Bank.
Basic Concept of Memory Bank: Official Guidelines
Memory Bank is a concept provided as an official custom instruction for Cline (and Roo Code), designed to streamline context sharing with AI. It's not a special plugin or tool, but a methodology for structured document management.
Basic Structure Provided by Official Documentation
According to Cline's official documentation, Memory Bank consists of creating a memory-bank/
folder in your project's root directory and placing multiple Markdown files within it.
project-root/
└── memory-bank/
├── projectbrief.md # Project overview and requirements
├── productContext.md # Product purpose and problem-solving
├── activeContext.md # Current work focus and recent changes
├── systemPatterns.md # System architecture and patterns
├── techContext.md # Technologies used and constraints
└── progress.md # Progress status and unresolved issues
Each file has a clearly defined role:
-
projectbrief.md: A fundamental document recording basic project information. Defines requirements, goals, and constraints.
-
productContext.md: Describes why this project exists, what problems it solves, and how it should function.
-
activeContext.md: Records current work focus, recent changes, next steps, and active decisions.
-
systemPatterns.md: Describes system architecture, major technical decisions, adopted design patterns, and relationships between components.
-
techContext.md: Records technologies used, development environment setup, technical constraints, and dependencies.
-
progress.md: Logs what has been completed, what remains, current status, and known issues.
Basic AI Collaboration Flow
I've set up my development flow using Memory Bank as follows. Pay particular attention to how I separate the Plan (Architect) and Act (Code) phases.
The most important aspect of this flow is that the AI must read the Memory Bank at the start of each task. This compensates for the AI's memory reset between tasks and maintains project context.
Memory Bank updates occur at two main points:
- Planning stage (after task begins): Record current situation and plans
- Post-implementation (when task completes): Record what was done, results, and lessons learned
Through these updates, Memory Bank grows as a knowledge repository for the project.
My Experience: Evolution from Manual Notes to Memory Bank
After understanding the official Memory Bank concept, I practiced and customized it across three projects over about one month. Here's the evolution of my approach.
First Project: Struggling with Meeting Notes
The first project involved developing an AI system to support investment decisions, implementing complex algorithms including Bayesian updates for modeling uncertainty.
Since I didn't know about Memory Bank yet, I was managing notes completely manually. The main problems I faced were:
- Time wasted repeating explanations: I had to repeatedly explain the same things, like Bayesian update algorithms
- Loss of intermediate progress: When a task required multiple sessions, intermediate states were often lost
- New burden of note-taking: While the AI worked, I spent time on note-taking – an activity that should have been unnecessary
I felt a dilemma where, despite my goal to "improve efficiency using AI," I was experiencing a situation where instead of making AI work for me, I was working for the AI.
Second Project: Introducing Memory Bank
For my second project, developing an AI-based evaluation system, I implemented the official Memory Bank structure for the first time and began operating within its basic framework.
Key improvements:
- Automated initial setup: Once basic project information was recorded, I no longer needed to re-explain it each time
- Continuity in work context: Intermediate progress from one task naturally carried over to the next session
- Improved AI understanding: Systematically organized information deepened the AI's comprehension
However, challenges remained with just the basic framework:
- Information volume growth: As the project progressed, Memory Bank grew increasingly large
- Lack of abstraction: Individual facts were recorded, but project-wide principles and lessons weren't easily extracted
- Cumbersome updates: Even small updates required rewriting entire sections, which was inefficient
Third Project: Customization and Extension
For my third project (this blog site), I built on the official Memory Bank structure while making important extensions based on my experience with the previous two projects. This is the core of my Memory Bank customization.
My Memory Bank Customizations and Innovations
This section covers the differences between the official Memory Bank and my customized version developed through practice. The official framework provides an excellent foundation, but actual operation presents various challenges. I made the following extensions to address them.
Additional Extended Files: For Knowledge Structuring and Abstraction
I added three extension files to the official six core files:
-
userFeedback.md: Records user preferences, interaction patterns, and micro-feedback history. This strengthens user-centered development.
-
metaLearning.md: Records self-reflection, reasoning processes, and lessons from failures. This is particularly important for promoting learning across projects.
-
principleHierarchy.md: Records abstract principles extracted from specific instructions. This makes the AI's judgment criteria more consistent.
With these extension files, Memory Bank evolved from a mere project information repository to a learning and knowledge structuring platform. Particularly important is the accumulation of reflection and learning through metaLearning.md.
Hierarchical Information Structure: Clarifying Relationships Between Information
Building on the official structure, I introduced a hierarchical information structure:
This hierarchical structure clarifies information flow and abstraction processes:
- Foundation layer:
projectbrief.md
provides the most basic information - Context layer:
productContext.md
,systemPatterns.md
,techContext.md
provide specific background information - Activity layer:
activeContext.md
,progress.md
record current state and progress - Learning layer:
userFeedback.md
,metaLearning.md
,principleHierarchy.md
abstract learning from experience
With this hierarchical structure, the AI can understand project context more systematically.
Introduction of Diff-Based Updates: Efficient Information Management
The official Memory Bank operation fundamentally updates entire files, but this becomes inefficient as projects grow. I included diff-based update instructions in my Custom Instructions:
- **update memory bank** - Add new information to the Memory Bank
- I MUST use diff-based updates (apply_diff) instead of rewriting entire files
- I MUST ONLY append new information to the relevant sections with date headers
- I MUST ALWAYS keep all existing content unchanged
- I MUST add clearly marked dated entries to appropriate sections
- Example: Adding a new "2025/03/17 - Feature Implementation" entry under "## Recent Changes"
With this instruction, the AI maintains existing information while adding only new information. This also leads to significant reduction in token consumption, enabling more efficient operation.
Adding Automatic Compression Process: Preventing Information Bloat
As Memory Bank operation continues, information bloat can exceed the AI's processing limit. To address this, I introduced a periodic compression process:
- **compress memory bank** - Reorganize and condense Memory Bank information
- I will review all files and consolidate redundant information
- I will summarize older entries while keeping recent details
- I will restructure content to be more concise while preserving key information
This compression process prevents bloat, especially in frequently updated files like activeContext.md
and progress.md
, maintaining essential information while reducing token consumption.
Effective Memory Bank Operation Techniques
Here are specific techniques for effective Memory Bank operation, gained from my practice across three projects.
Date-Based Information Structuring: Organizing on a Timeline
Organizing Memory Bank information based on dates clarifies temporal context:
## Implementation Progress
### 2025/03/15 - User Authentication Feature
Completed basic implementation of authentication. Adopted JWT authentication method.
### 2025/03/16 - Profile Editing Feature
Implemented functionality allowing users to edit their own profiles.
This date-based structure makes project progression easy to grasp chronologically. Latest information is immediately visible, allowing the AI to quickly understand context.
Clear Distinction Between Decisions and Unresolved Issues: State Transparency
For clear project status tracking, it's important to distinguish between decided matters and unresolved issues:
## Decided Matters
- Database: PostgreSQL
- Authentication: JWT
- Deployment: Vercel
## Unresolved Issues
- Image processing performance optimization
- Multilingual support policy
- Search feature implementation approach
This distinction helps the AI accurately understand the project's current state and focus proposals on unresolved issues.
Documentation in English: Optimizing Compatibility with AI
This may be surprising, but I strongly recommend writing Memory Bank in English even when communicating in Japanese. There are several reasons:
- Compatibility with AI models: Many AI models are optimized for English processing
- Consistency in technical terminology: Many technical terms are in English, avoiding inconsistencies from translation
- Token efficiency: Japanese tends to consume more tokens compared to English
In practice, I adopted a hybrid approach where Memory Bank is written in English while communication with the AI is in Japanese. I prevent information loss by preserving important Japanese expressions in parentheses.
Broader Insights from Memory Bank: Implications for Knowledge Management
Insights gained from the Memory Bank concept and practice have wide application potential beyond AI collaborative development.
Comparison with Daily Reports and Meeting Minutes Bloat Problem
Many organizations face the problem of daily reports and meeting minutes growing over time, creating mountains of documents nobody reads. While these documents accumulate information, their value decreases over time.
In contrast, Memory Bank:
- Focuses on information abstraction and structuring
- Summarizes and compresses old information, retaining essential insights
- Organizes information hierarchically, enabling access to necessary information when needed
These characteristics make Memory Bank function not just as a recording medium but as a knowledge distillation apparatus. It extracts essential insights from daily trivial events, utilizing them as guidelines for future judgments and actions.
Application to Team Collaboration and Knowledge Management
The Memory Bank concept can be applied not only to AI collaboration but also to human-to-human collaboration:
-
Team knowledge structuring:
- Accumulating individual members' experiences and insights in structured form
- Promoting conversion of tacit knowledge to explicit knowledge
-
Streamlining onboarding:
- Foundation for new members to efficiently understand team context
- Promoting understanding of "why this decision was made"
-
Knowledge inheritance:
- Reducing risk of knowledge loss when members leave
- Preserving team's collective intelligence in structured form
These applications make Memory Bank a powerful tool for protecting and developing a team's intellectual assets.
Implications for Information Management in Broader Context
The Memory Bank concept provides insights for information management in an even broader context:
-
Multi-layered information structuring:
- Capturing not just fact records but their meaning and relevance
- Extracting essence through multi-layered abstraction
-
Efficient knowledge inheritance:
- Inheriting tacit knowledge gained from experience in structured form
- Conveying not just "what was learned" but "why it was judged that way"
-
Scalable knowledge management:
- Compression and abstraction mechanisms to handle information growth
- Information differentiation based on importance
These principles can be applied at various levels, from personal knowledge management to organizational knowledge management.
Challenges and Future Outlook
Memory Bank technology is still evolving, with challenges to solve and future development possibilities.
Current Challenges and Constraints
-
Token consumption optimization:
- Increased token consumption as Memory Bank grows
- Need for information prioritization and selective loading
-
Information search efficiency:
- Difficulty extracting relevant information from large volumes
- Desirable to integrate semantic search functionality
-
Update automation and quality assurance:
- Balance between automatic updates and human review
- Maintaining information accuracy and relevance
Development in Line with AI Model Evolution
AI models are rapidly evolving, and Memory Bank design will change accordingly:
-
Improved long-term memory capability:
- As AI's internal memory capability improves, Memory Bank's role will change
- Shift towards recording higher-level abstraction and principles
-
Integration of multimodal information:
- Managing complex information beyond text, including images and diagrams
- Efficient transmission of visual design information
-
Enhanced self-management capability:
- Autonomous management of Memory Bank by AI
- Automatic importance judgment, compression, and structuring of information
As AI capabilities improve, Memory Bank's focus will shift from "information storage" to "information meaning-making and structuring."
Development into Multi-Agent Environments
In the future, environments where multiple AI agents collaborate will increase:
-
Shared Memory Bank:
- Unified context shared among multiple AI agents
- Integration of each agent's perspective and contribution
-
Role-based access control:
- Optimizing information access according to agent roles
- Information filtering based on specialization
-
Collaborative learning and knowledge fusion:
- Mechanism to integrate learning from each agent
- Memory Bank as collective intelligence
Conclusion: Essential Lessons from Memory Bank
The essence of Memory Bank is a knowledge and context sharing foundation between humans and AI as well as a platform for knowledge structuring and abstraction. The main lessons from my practice across three projects are:
-
Efficient onboarding is essential when collaborating with AI that resets memory with each task
- Not just information sharing, but knowledge structuring and prioritization are important
- Communication with AI depends not only on "what to convey" but "how to structure it"
-
Value comes not just from information accumulation but from abstraction and compression
- Quality and structuring matter more than quantity
- Knowledge increases in value when periodically restructured, not just stored
-
Context sharing is a universal challenge applicable to human teams
- Insights gained from AI collaboration can be applied to human-to-human communication
- Shifting perspective from "recording for recording's sake" to "recording for utilization"
-
Design as a living system rather than static documentation is important
- Not a one-time creation but a system that continuously evolves
- Principles of self-organization and self-optimization
Memory Bank is both a tool and a philosophy in AI collaboration. It's not just a place to store information but an approach to building a foundation for intellectual collaboration between humans and AI.
I hope this technology, which I discovered, customized, and implemented across three projects in about a month, will become a standard approach in AI-driven development. And its benefits will extend beyond software development to all forms of intellectual collaboration.
By actually putting Memory Bank into practice in your own projects, you should be able to experience new possibilities in AI collaboration.