Long-form Content Strategy in the Information Explosion Era: Essential Value Built by Quality and Depth

The Paradoxical Value of Long-Form Content in the AI Era

In an age where 15-second videos get millions of views and 140-character tweets shape public opinion, there's a reason I continue to write only long-form content. Even as the development of social media and generative AI has led to an explosive increase in content that can be consumed in short timeframes, this choice deliberately goes against the current.

Going against trends, but aligned with essence. This seemingly contradictory statement forms the core of my information sharing strategy.

Long-form content requiring over 10 minutes to read will appear too costly for many people. Indeed, research suggests the average attention span of modern humans has decreased to around 8 seconds¹. However, I believe this "high cost" is precisely what creates value.

In this age of information overload, access to information itself no longer holds scarcity value. Using Google search or ChatGPT, you can instantly obtain vast amounts of "answers." What has become scarce is the ability to discern the quality of information and integrate it into your own context for practical use. In other words, scarcity has shifted from "information" to "intelligence" and "wisdom".

Within this paradigm shift, long-form content serves two important functions.

First, it functions as a selection mechanism. Those who read long-form content to completion possess characteristics that don't shy away from deep understanding and thinking. This serves as a natural selection mechanism.

Second, it functions as an intelligence cultivation device. Long-form content presenting complex concepts and multiple perspectives can serve as a catalyst that trains the reader's thinking ability itself.

Running an AI education business, I've viscerally felt how the value of "knowledge" itself is rapidly declining while the value of "intelligence that utilizes knowledge" is relatively increasing. This recognition forms the foundation of my paradoxical long-form strategy.

図表を生成中...

Practical Application of Innovator Theory

Positioning as an Innovator

Innovator theory, which explains how new ideas and technologies spread through society, provides important insights when considering information sharing strategies. According to this theory proposed by Everett Rogers, people who accept new things are classified into five categories: Innovators (2.5%), Early Adopters (13.5%), Early Majority (34%), Late Majority (34%), and Laggards (16%)².

I apply this model to information sharing, positioning myself as an innovator and directly targeting early adopters. This is because they are the true catalysts of social change.

Early adopters aren't simply people who jump on new things. They possess the ability to deeply understand information, integrate it into their own context, and further influence those around them. Deeply appealing to people with these characteristics ultimately leads to broader influence.

The Essence of Early Adopters' Ripple Effect

What makes early adopters truly valuable is their network effect and trust capital. Research in social network analysis shows that in the diffusion of innovation, social validation of information reliability is more important than access to information itself³.

When early adopters adopt something, it becomes "social proof" for the early majority. In other words, they aren't mere transmitters, but value converters.

I've experienced this principle in developing AI education businesses. Typical early adopters actively share their learning within organizations, sometimes holding voluntary internal study sessions, contributing to the diffusion of knowledge. Without them, even the best educational content would not permeate the entire organization.

The Insight to Identify Who Can Change

There is an order of magnitude difference between the cost of changing people who cannot change and changing people who can change. This insight lies at the core of any social transformation effort.

Psychologist Carl Rogers stated that "people have the potential to change, but change cannot be forced"⁴. Change occurs intrinsically, and externally we can only provide the optimal environment and catalyst.

That's why it's strategically important to create content that reaches people who already harbor the potential and motivation for change, rather than aiming for content that reaches everyone. In fact, even as short-form content like TikTok continues to expand, demand for niche and specialized long-form content is simultaneously increasing⁵.

In the modern era where AI technology advancement is accelerating, content that merely rides trends will quickly be buried in a sea of similar content. Within this environment, deeply connecting with readers who hold specific values and orientations becomes the source of sustainable influence.

The Essence of Information Sharing as "Companion Gathering"

The Long-Term Value of Relational Capital

For me, information sharing isn't merely "information dissemination" but "companion gathering." This concept of "companion gathering" is deeply related to "relational capital" in management studies.

Relational capital refers to the value created from an organization's or individual's network of relationships⁶. It's not about short-term follower counts or number of "likes," but the totality of trust relationships based on common values and goals.

What can be gained by pursuing short-term buzz or superficial popularity is surprisingly little in the long term. Temporary attention is quickly stolen by the next stimulating content. Meanwhile, relationships based on deep empathy and trust create value compoundingly over time.

Insights on Community Building from AI Education Business

Running an AI education business since 2017, I've felt the importance of relational capital. On the surface, the goal seems to be acquiring many customers, but what has actually sustained business growth is deep relationships with enthusiastic supporters.

They don't just learn themselves but spread what they've learned throughout their organizations, sometimes becoming introducers to other companies, and even co-developers of new courses. This is close to the concept of "advocates" in marketing terminology⁷.

What I've learned from this experience is that "narrow and deep" relationships have far greater long-term influence than "wide and shallow" ones. And building such deep relationships requires providing essential value, not superficial stimulation.

Balancing Short-Term Challenges with Long-Term Value

Information sharing centered on long-form content clearly involves short-term difficulties. It takes considerable time to create content, and the number of readers tends to be limited.

However, I consider this similar to an "initial investment" in business. Sherwood Fine pointed out the phenomenon of sacrificing long-term value in pursuit of immediate results with the concept of the "short-term orientation trap"⁸.

True success comes from resisting such short-term temptations and consistently providing value. Creating a blog isn't the goal; relationship building through information sharing is just the first step. The relationships with clients, investors, and collaborators that emerge from this become the true assets.

図表を生成中...

Understanding Information Value Hierarchy Through the DIKIW Model

The Staircase from Data to Wisdom

To understand the value and function of information more deeply, the conceptual framework of the DIKIW model (Data, Information, Knowledge, Intelligence, Wisdom) is effective. This model expands on Russell Ackoff's originally proposed DIKW model (Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom) by adding the "Intelligence" layer⁹.

Each layer can be understood as follows:

1. Data: Raw records or values without context. For example, fragmentary values like "32.5," "Tokyo," "2025."
2. Information: Data with added meaning or context. For example, "The average temperature in Tokyo in 2025 is 32.5 degrees."
3. Knowledge: Systematized information made usable. For example, "The main causes of urban temperature rise are heat storage in concrete and waste heat."
4. Intelligence: The ability to apply knowledge to actual problem-solving or creative thinking. Includes pattern recognition, critical thinking, and creative application.
5. Wisdom: Deep insight that integrates value judgments and ethical considerations with intelligence. Based on long-term perspective and universal values.

An important point of this model is that conversion from lower to higher layers involves not just accumulation but qualitative change. Especially for the transition from knowledge to intelligence, and further to wisdom, human-specific thought processes become essential.

Areas AI Can Replace and Human-Specific Domains

How much of this DIKIW hierarchy can modern AI technology, especially large language models (LLMs), cover? This question is fundamentally important when considering the value of long-form content.

As I discussed in Understanding AI Essence Through Solomonoff Induction, modern AI extracts patterns from vast data and predicts the next elements probabilistically based on those patterns. This essentially means it can efficiently process up to the "knowledge" layer.

However, in the "intelligence" layer, especially creative problem-solving and critical thinking, AI possesses only partial capabilities. Furthermore, regarding the "wisdom" layer—deep insights including value judgments and ethical considerations—AI merely mimics human values.

This indicates that while knowledge acquisition itself has become easier through AI, the domains of intelligence and wisdom are becoming the center of uniquely human value.

The Unique Value of Long-Form Content in Cultivating "Intelligence"

In this context, the unique value of long-form content emerges.

Short-form content excels primarily at transmitting data, information, and sometimes knowledge. For example, information like "Tomorrow's weather in Tokyo is rain" or knowledge like "Pay attention to vitamin D intake during rainy weather" can be efficiently conveyed in short formats.

Meanwhile, long-form content steps into the domains of intelligence and wisdom. It can share the process of thinking that considers problems from multiple perspectives, connects seemingly unrelated concepts, or questions assumptions themselves. This isn't mere knowledge transmission but sharing of thinking itself.

As I discussed in Will AI Take Away Human Intelligence?, distinguishing between thought processes AI can handle and those it cannot is important in modern times. Long-form content clarifies this distinction and can become a means of sharing the "journey of thought" that AI struggles with.

図表を生成中...

Information Age Paradox: The Inverse Relationship Between Quantity and Quality

Dilution of True Value Through Information Explosion

In recent years, the production and consumption of information has increased exponentially. According to IDC research, the world's digital data volume is predicted to increase by about 65% annually until 2025, reaching 175 zettabytes¹⁰. While such quantitative expansion brings convenience, it also causes qualitative problems.

Information overload has become a universal problem for modern humans. According to social psychologist Berlin Scheinte, information overload causes various cognitive and psychological problems such as decreased judgment, increased anxiety, and postponed decisions¹¹.

This phenomenon is similar to the problem of "adverse selection" in economics. In markets where quality judgment is difficult, low-quality products drive out high-quality ones. Similarly, in the information market, there exists a structural problem where quantitative expansion leads to quality decline.

The proliferation of generative AI like ChatGPT is further accelerating this problem. Text generation that previously required considerable effort has been automated, and the volume of content on the web is exploding. As a result, finding desired information through search engines is becoming increasingly difficult.

The Essential Difference Between Data Volume and Information Volume

In this context, the distinction between data volume and information volume (or semantic value) is important.

A mere increase in character count or article number is just an increase in "data volume." Meanwhile, the creation of truly valuable insights or new observations is an increase in "information volume." These are qualitatively different concepts, and an increase in data volume does not necessarily mean an increase in information volume.

Indeed, from an information theory perspective, mere symbol sequences and meaningful messages are distinguished. According to Claude Shannon's definition, information is "that which reduces uncertainty"¹². From this perspective, mere duplication or restructuring of existing information does not constitute a true increase in information volume.

Particularly, AI text generation technology generates new text based on patterns learned from existing content. This may appear new on the surface, but it's essentially a probabilistic reconstruction of existing information and doesn't produce truly new insights or original thinking.

The Limitations of AI-Generated Content from a Solomonoff Induction Perspective

As discussed in Understanding AI Essence Through Solomonoff Induction, there are fundamental limitations to AI's generative abilities. According to Solomonoff induction theory, the shortest program (simplest explanation) provides the best prediction.

Modern AI models function in a way close to this principle, and therefore can generate "plausible" text based on patterns learned from vast data. However, truly creative thinking or generating fundamentally new insights is difficult with current AI architectures.

With this recognition, it becomes clear that the acceleration of information production by AI brings an increase in data volume, not information volume (semantic value). In other words, noise in the information environment is increasing, making it increasingly difficult to find truly valuable signals.

This situation suggests that the act of increasing data volume without increasing information volume can become a kind of "social harm." This is because it promotes waste of limited cognitive resources and hinders the discovery of truly valuable information.

図表を生成中...

Design Philosophy to Overcome Reading Barriers

Balancing Cognitive Load and Value Recognition

The biggest challenge of long-form content is the time and cognitive effort required from readers. When the average reading time is 20-30 minutes, many people perceive it as "too long."

Cognitive psychology studies how people prioritize information processing within limited cognitive resources (attention economy)¹³. According to these findings, people decide actions based on the balance between "cost (cognitive load)" and "benefit (value gained)."

For long-form content to be read, value commensurate with cognitive load must be clearly recognized. That is, it must be judged as "worth reading even if it takes time."

This isn't about motivation like "I want to read it because it's simply easy," but creating the recognition that "there's value I want to obtain even at a cost." That becomes the condition for content that moves people, not content that is merely consumed.

Strategic Application of Structure and Visualization

To lower reading barriers while maintaining essential depth, structuring and visualization become powerful tools. This isn't about simplifying content, but supporting more efficient understanding of complex content.

According to information processing theory, human working memory is limited, with restrictions on the amount of information that can be processed at once¹⁴. However, more efficient processing becomes possible by structuring information and connecting it to existing knowledge structures (schemas).

Practically, the following approaches are effective:

• Hierarchical heading structure: Clearly shows the logical structure of information and enables direct access to sections of interest
• Utilization of visual elements: Concretizes complex concept relationships and abstract ideas with diagrams
• Gradual information presentation: Structure that gradually deepens from basics to applications
• Appropriate whitespace and line breaks: Reduces the load of visual processing

These techniques not only enhance "readability" but become means to more effectively convey complex thinking. I've confirmed through practice that similar approaches are effective in AI education processes as well.

The Essence of Content That Makes People "Want to Return"

Another important element in increasing the completion rate of long-form content is presenting value that makes people think, "I want to come back when I have time." This differs from entertainment elements like "I'm curious about what happens next."

Psychologist Robert Cialdini points out the Zeigarnik effect, which states that "uncompleted tasks tend to remain in memory"¹⁵. Content with complexity and depth that cannot be completely digested has a higher chance of lingering in the reader's thoughts.

High-quality long-form content promotes internal dialogue even after reading. It's a kind of "thought seeding" that germinates and grows within the reader over time. The value of this internal dialogue becomes the essential attraction that draws readers back again.

What I've learned from AI education practice is that the essence of learning is not the closed sensation of "I understand" but the open curiosity of "I want to know more". Similarly, long-form content can become the foundation for building sustainable relationships by continuously stimulating readers' curiosity and thinking.

From Community Building to Social Transformation

A Chain of Transformation Starting with Early Adopters

The ultimate purpose of an information distribution strategy centered on long-form content is not merely knowledge sharing, but triggering a chain reaction of transformation.

According to organizational transformation research, successful change requires a certain number of supporters called "critical mass" ¹⁶. What's noteworthy is that this critical mass doesn't necessarily need to be the majority, but rather significant change can begin from an influential minority.

Early adopters serve exactly this role. They internalize new ideas and perspectives themselves and become "catalysts for change" by spreading them to those around them. There is an order of magnitude difference between the cost of changing people who resist change and the cost of supporting those who are ready for change—this is a reality I've experienced through my AI education business.

As a typical example, I've repeatedly seen cases where one motivated engineer triggers transformation across an entire organization. They share the knowledge they've learned within the company, gradually raising the level of technical dialogue, eventually leading to company-wide AI adoption. Conversely, investing in a large number of unmotivated people rarely produces true change.

The Essence of Information Distribution as "Gathering Companions"

For me, information distribution is not simply "spreading information" but building relationship capital as "gathering companions". This is deeply related to the concept of "relational capital" in management studies.

Relational capital refers to the value that emerges from an organization's or individual's network of relationships ⁶. It is the totality of trust relationships based on shared values, not superficial follower counts.

The value of long-term relationship building far outweighs the value of pursuing short-term buzz. Short-term attention is quickly stolen by the next stimulating content, but relationships based on deep empathy and trust create value compounding over time. This is similar to "initial investment" in business. As Sherwood Fine points out, it's important not to fall into the "short-term orientation trap" ⁸.

With the advancement of AI technology, access to information has become easier, but the scarcity of quality human relationships has increased. Creating a blog is not the goal; the true asset is the connections with clients, investors, and collaborators that emerge as the first step of relationship building through information distribution.

Call to Action for Readers: Creating a Chain of Small but Deep Influence

If you've read this article to the end, you possess the characteristics of an early adopter. You are open to new perspectives, don't shy away from deep thinking, and have an attitude of expanding your own understanding.

What I hope from someone like you is conscious use of your influence on those around you. If you find particular value here, I certainly welcome you sharing it on social media. However, at the same time, I would be even happier if you could integrate the insights you found valuable into your own context and directly share them with 5 people with whom you have the most trusting relationships.

Why do I emphasize direct sharing? According to social network theory, dialogue with a small number of people with whom you have close trust relationships has qualitatively different influence than wide but shallow diffusion ¹⁷. What's important is not merely transferring information, but transmission with your own interpretation and context added—this is the process that creates uniquely human value different from mechanical diffusion. Both sharing on social media and direct dialogue play complementary roles.

And if you empathize with the issues raised in this article and want to explore them more deeply, I welcome the possibility of co-creation through direct dialogue opportunities. True transformation begins from deep dialogue between individuals.

Being faithful to the essence even while going against trends. I am convinced that this seemingly contradictory stance is at the core of value creation in the age of information overload. It may involve difficulties in the short term, but I believe it is a path that leads to building truly meaningful relationship capital and social transformation in the long term.

References

Footnotes

1. McSpadden, K. (2015). "You Now Have a Shorter Attention Span Than a Goldfish," Time. ↩

2. Rogers, E.M. (2003). "Diffusion of Innovations," 5th Edition. Free Press. ↩

3. Centola, D. (2018). "How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions," Princeton University Press. ↩

4. Rogers, C.R. (1995). "On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy," Mariner Books. ↩

5. Nielsen, J. (2023). "Long-form Content Is Making a Comeback," Nielsen Norman Group. ↩

6. Sveiby, K.E. (2001). "A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation," Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 2 Issue: 4, pp.344-358. ↩ ↩²

7. Fuggetta, R. (2012). "Brand Advocates: Turning Enthusiastic Customers into a Powerful Marketing Force," Wiley. ↩

8. Fine, S.H. (2009). "Temporal Perspective and Perceived Urgency," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 95-102. ↩ ↩²

9. Liew, A. (2013). "DIKIW: Data, Information, Knowledge, Intelligence, Wisdom and their Interrelationships," Business Management Dynamics, Vol. 2, No. 10, pp. 49-62. ↩

10. Reinsel, D., Gantz, J., & Rydning, J. (2020). "The Digitization of the World – From Edge to Core," IDC White Paper. ↩

11. Scheinte, B. (2016). "Information Overload: Causes, Symptoms and Solutions," Harvard Graduate School of Education. ↩

12. Shannon, C.E. (1948). "A Mathematical Theory of Communication," The Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379–423, 623–656. ↩

13. Davenport, T.H. & Beck, J.C. (2001). "The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business," Harvard Business School Press. ↩

14. Sweller, J. (2011). "Cognitive Load Theory," Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 55, pp. 37-76. ↩

15. Cialdini, R.B. (2006). "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion," Harper Business. ↩

16. Granovetter, M. (1978). "Threshold Models of Collective Behavior," American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 6, pp. 1420-1443. ↩

17. Dunbar, R.I.M. (1992). "Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates," Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 22, Issue 6, pp. 469-493. ↩